|
The faith of Charles Darwin
Darwin's later religious beliefs have been
the subject of some controversy, yet this statement in a letter he wrote
late in life seems to show his position:
[I feel] the extreme difficulty or rather
impossibility of conceiving this immense and wonderful universe, including
man with his capacity of looking far backwards and far into futurity, as the
result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting, I feel compelled
to look to a First Cause having an intelligent mind in some degree analogous
to that of man; and I deserve to be called a Theist. This conclusion was
strong in mind about the time, as far as I can remember, when I wrote the Origin
of Species, and it is since that time that it has very gradually, and
with many fluctuations, become weaker. But then arises the doubt - can the
mind of man, which has, as I fully believe, been developed from a mind as
low as that possessed by the lowest animals, be trusted when it draws such
grand conclusions?
I cannot pretend to throw the least light on such
abstruse problems. The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble
by us, and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.
Anglicans and Evolution
Frederick Temple (1821-1902 A.D.),
ex-Headmaster of Rugby, Bishop of Exeter and a future Archbishop of
Canterbury, shows in this extract from his Bamptom Lectures of 1884 A.D.
that a liberal-minded Anglican could come to find little but profit in the
theory of evolution:
In conclusion, we cannot find that science, in
teaching evolution, has yet asserted anything that is inconsistent with
revelation, unless we assume that revelation was intended not to teach
spiritual truth only, but physical truth also. Here, as in all similar
cases, we find that the writer of the Book of Genesis, like all the other
writers in the bible, took nature as he saw it, and expressed his teaching
in language corresponding to what he saw. And the doctrine of evolution, in
so far as it has been shown to be true, does but fill out in detail the
declaration that we are Fearfully and wonderfully made, marvelous are Thy
works, and that my soul knoweth right well' There is nothing in all that
science has yet taught, or is on the was to teach, which conflicts with the
doctrine that we are made in the Divine Image, rulers of the creation around
us by a divine superiority, the recipients of a revelation from a Father in
Heaven, and responsible to judgment by His law. We know not how the first
human soul was made, just as we know not how any human soul has been made
since; but we know that we are, in a sense in which no other creatures
living with us are, the children of His special care.
|